For example, photographing a protest and sharing it on YouTube as citizen journalism might be OK, but taking pictures of a building from a public sidewalk for your own use might not be. Our Constitution’s First Amendment offers a lot of protection, but it doesn’t shield all photographic activities. However, because our judicial system is so complex and laws can be interpreted in many ways, that innocent thinking isn’t enough to keep you out of the courts and enduring a potentially long and costly process. Most people are under the impression that as long as they’re on public property, not invading someone’s privacy, and shoot for private enjoyment, then their photography is fair game. There seems to be daily reports of people getting into trouble with the law over photography. Try me.”Īs previously reported by RSBN, Maricopa County, Arizona, was plagued by reports of rampant election problems on Election Day in November 2022, resulting in a reported 59 percent of voting machine failure and widespread voter disenfranchisement.Of course, this isn’t the first time a photographer has gotten himself into hot water. She continued, “Now, the AZ Supreme Court has ruled that the very fraud I highlighted has to be looked at.
“They want to ARREST me for exposing fraud in the 2022 Election,” Lake stated on Twitter, sharing screenshots of mainstream headlines floating a felony arrest for the GOP superstar in relation to the very signature verification process that the court is demanding clarification on. Now, the AZ Supreme Court has ruled that the very fraud I highlighted has to be looked at.
They want to ARREST me for exposing fraud in the 2022 Election.
0 kommentar(er)
